Should We Ban Space Exploration?

Speech Presentation

The paper is a speech on the topic: ‘should we ban space exploration? The review centers on various articles published in the Journal of space exploration. The research is significant in knowledge transfer because it presents thoughtful information on space exploration. The speech starts with an outline of space exploration and highlights the research aspect in this field. While much as the presentation is quick to point out how data will be evaluated through a survey, but fails to indicate how qualitative and quantitative data will be acquired. It also fails to mention the study’s sample size and how data will be presented. In any case, a standard presentation should include all elements to give the audience a clear picture of the speech. This presentation, therefore, falls short of those standards, making it as erroneous and unreliable as it gets. The presentation will include qualitative and quantitative methods in determining why exploration space should be banned.

The quantitative method aims to determine factors and theories. The hypothesis and aims were appropriately defined with evident standards of the critical factors. The assumptions, literature review, and theoretical approaches were dependable. However, this presentation’s research objectives and questions are not clearly stated. The literature review was required to illustrate and construct research questions while at the same time determining a suitable method of gathering data, constituting a critical analysis of the available data. Following the sources that formulated the speech, the presenter was passionate about the subject of study.

The speech embraces works by various scholars, hence developing a convincing presentation by reviewing informed sources, making it a well-researched and well-documented speech. Doing more research on the topic enhanced other scholars’ understanding of the topic. From the beginning, the speech fails to give a background of the study. Providing a background is critical for providing a clear picture of the topic that researchers are engaging in with a view to solving some contemporary problems. Equally, the background study would include an extensive review of the main issue, giving not only the researchers but also readers and users of the information to understand why the presenter was conducting the study. A missing background in the paper fails to paint the bigger picture of the existing problem researchers are researching, making this study relatively ineffective and inefficient.

Given the significance of this study, the literature review has been adequately explained. This is relevant as it informs the audience about new facts or undiscovered data on how individual motivation impacts novel information diffusion structure, which supports the study. Typically, theoretical concepts make studies more convincing. However, the issue of trustworthiness and legitimacy should not be mixed up. In this case, credibility does not refer to validity but rather the necessary weight, particularly individual connectedness and innovation. In addition, the presenter used theory on why space exploration should be banished.

The presenter identified relevant data to help in the analysis of the study. This is important in providing a general and clear understanding of the topic. Theoretical analysis in this speech was a review of information from previous studies. On the contrary, data on space exploration was complex compared with previous research. Much as this speech incorporates theory to help develop a strong argument on space exploration, it fails to base the same on the last research because of the scarcity of data.

The presentation highlighted qualitative and quantitative techniques to help develop a solid argument from the introduction to the conclusion regarding space exploration. The study presented upholds the scientific method, which is quantitatively used for collecting orderly practical investigation via mathematical or statistical approach. The hypothesis and mathematical models related to the investigated issue were developed precisely. Nevertheless, the determinant aspect, an important aspect of quantitative research, fails to present the essential relationships between mathematical models and experimental findings owing to conflicting results.

Much as the presentation highlights the research design by giving the number of respondents that took part in the study, it fails to enlist all these elements in a format that is easy to comprehend. Research design is considered necessary because it explains methods rooted in data practically achieved through a survey. In the methodology section, the researchers identified the scope of the study and information generation. Through semi-structured interviews and ego-centric network surveys to help them get relevant data on why space exploration should be banned.

However, the presentation has many gaps because of the bias that comes with the study. For instance, the researcher has authority over the sampling technique; the whole process is thrown into disarray, an aspect that questions the study’s veracity. At the same time, the research is developed on a concept that lacks a profound distribution of the populace and of the sample.

Just because respondents in this approach tend to nominate people of their choice based on personal relationships, the approach undermines the standards of research because it is likely to be pegged on slanted findings. Instead, the study would have embraced random sampling, giving every population member an equal chance of being selected. Random selections are naturally unbiased; this would be significant when drawing a valid conclusion from the study’s outcomes. As we know, the main objective of any research is to arrive at some conclusive and substantive end concerning the population sampled.

Data reliability is the degree to at information used in the study can comply with the results. On the other hand, validity is also important because they ensure that the results are related to their appearance. For a given study to be valid, scholars use analysis questions to select theory and survey techniques. Subsequently, limitations are not outlined in the paper. All studies should outline limitations encountered in the process. Remarkably, the scholars identified several ways to reduce shortcomings, making the analysis less reliable. Additionally, the researcher tabulated a summary of significant findings. These summaries are essential in providing broad and immediate opinions without the reader having to go through the entire presentation

The presentation does not clarify ethical standards that require authorization before embarking on the study. Nevertheless, the presentation fails to indicate if the data collected was to be kept safe and confidential as stipulated by the Data Protection Act, which argues that people’s information must be kept safe as agreed, especially among professional players, as failure to do so could be a criminal case. Carrying research could harm those who participate; this can be to self-esteem and career prospects for future employment.

However, the speech is presented in a way that the audience finds complex to follow under normal circumstances. The presentation would use an outline necessary to enhance coherence and the easy to follow through and understand. Presenting the audience with respondents helps them establish whether the representation is significant. The presentation, therefore, fails to substantiate the actual situation on the ground. Sampling is effective in using the available resources-time and money. Nonetheless, such samples need to depict the entire populace significantly. Therefore, the researchers used a significant sample to represent the issue under investigation population.

In addition, the speech presented the analysis of the critical variable. The presentation adopted descriptive statistics to analyze why space exploration should be banned. Therefore, any presentation must incorporate several past studies performed consistently in their research to present a more reliable speech presentation. Whereas the core facet of this presentation is the review of statistics on why space exploration should be abolished, detailed research would be needed to arrive at a conclusive end.

By Lucas Ngoya in Blog on August 12, 2022