Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Key To Success
BUS 352 Week 7 Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Details:
BUS 352 Week 7 Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper. For this assignment, you will discuss how Christian principles can be applied to ethical issues in statistics.
Required Reading:
Read the following:
“Ethical Issues” sections in Chapters 4.5, 8.5, and 9.5 in the textbook.
Chapters 7.1 and 7.2 in the textbook.
The “Reflection Before Action: The Statistical Consultant Confronts Ethical Issues” article. In this article, the authors cite the American Statistical Association’s Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice (see the “Ethics Provides a Defensible Response” section of the article). Take note of the information in this section (see http://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2001/consultant.htm).
The “A Christian View of the Foundations of Statistics” article (see http://www.asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/1987/PSCF9-87Geertsema.html).
Essay:
Write a paper that considers ethical issues in business statistics and discuss how your personal values can be applied to them. This assignment is primarily introspective in nature and students will be given significant latitude in addressing specific questions. Specifically, provide the following in your paper:
Include a brief introduction that outlines your paper.
Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Address the following question: Which ethical guideline(s) from the articles is (are) most applicable to you and why? How does this article (or how do the articles) affect your personal decision making related to statistics and ethics?
How can the ethical issue(s) raised be addressed from a Christian worldview? In other words, what guidance, using principles from a Christian worldview perspective, could be applied to understand and address these ethical issues? The following GCU websites may be helpful: (a) Doctrinal Statement (http://www.gcu.edu/About-Us/Doctrinal-Statement.php) and (b) Mission and Vision (http://www.gcu.edu/About-Us/Mission-and-Vision.php.)
In addition to addressing these questions, the student may also frame the issue using ethical theories (utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, distributive justice, virtue ethics, and covenantal ethics). Note, however, that the previously posed questions about Christian worldview must still be addressed.
Provide a brief conclusion that summarizes your perspectives.
Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Use external citations. Your paper should have at least six external citations (in addition to any Biblical citations) to help frame the issue. Wikipedia citations are not allowed.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Christian Worldview/Statistics Integration Paper
Order 100% plagiarism free essay now
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3 Satisfactory 75.00% |
4 Good 85.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
| 100.0 %Content | ||||||
| 70.0 %Ethical issue summarized Responses to the question(s) in the text provided Issue addressed from a Christian worldview | Little or no items addressed per the assignment requirements. | Most items not addressed. | Most items addressed; however, some items required additional detail or not addressed at all. | All items addressed with a certain degree of detail. | All items addressed with excellent detail. | |
| 5.0 %Word Count (entire paper) | Word Count (entire paper) less than 800 words. | Word Count (entire paper) from 800-999 words. | Word Count (entire paper) from 1000-1100 words. | Word Count (entire paper) from 1100-1299 words. | Word Count (entire paper) equal to or at least 1300 words. | |
| 5.0 %Evidence and references to other sources | Evidence was absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. | Weak, marginal evidence was present. | A diversity of evidence quantity and types was minimally present. | A diversity of evidence quantity and types was mostly present. | A diversity of evidence quantity and types was present. | |
| 10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, proper documentation of sources) | Surface errors were pervasive enough that they impeded communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors that distracted the reader were present. | Some mechanical errors or typos were present; however, they were not overly distracting to the reader. | Prose was largely free of mechanical errors, although a few errors were present. | Writer was clearly in control of standard, written American English. | |
| 10.0 %Documentation Format (includes use of appropriate style, correct in-text and citation format, etc.) | Rarely followed any documentation format correctly. | Frequent formatting/ citation errors were present. | Some documentation format or citation errors were present; however, they were not overly distracting to the reader. | There were some minor errors in documentation format or citation. | There were virtually no errors in documentation format or citation. | |
| 100 %Total Weightage | ||||||
Order Dissert Now
We Guarantee
